"Cosmic Strings"
William S. Stoertz
January 6, 1997
Moscow, Russia, Northeast Continent

(11:06 pm)
WS -- Dearest Heavenly Father, why do they talk about
"cosmic strings"?
HF -- There's some truth there...
WS -- Did they ask You about it?
HF -- They can't think, but that I am somewhat lending to
(inspiring) their thought...
WS -- Would You tell them the whole answer?
HF -- Not quite...
WS -- Why do they want to talk about cosmic strings?
HF -- "Cosmic" is what? Beyond just the 3 dimensions of
time and space. "Strings" is what? Attached, and
continuous... long... Something hidden (from view).
WS -- Can You see them?
HF -- In My way, of course. What is time?
WS -- Only in the ideal realm.... from the perspective of the
viewer...
HF -- Then what do strings attach?
WS -- One time and another time.... one space and another
space. Can they go "across"?
HF -- That's the point. What can they do and not do?
WS -- What do they attach?
HF -- They are the particle....
WS -- Is it a good idea?
HF -- It depends upon what you want to use it for.... It is a
model....
WS -- What's the model useful for?
HF -- For showing you the things that are hidden, that you
cannot see. You see, I know what to do if the answer is not
clear. That way converts it into what you understand.
WS -- Now that makes sense. How do You do that?
HF -- Use your original mind. It's My object in you. So,
now what do you want to know?
WS -- What do You say about gravitons?
HF -- Unlikely. Although I can imagine the idea. If so, it
would be too rare, and exchange with what? Blow it to
pieces! If not, otherwise a field-effect, and then, anyway,
you have the same thing. Graviton-mediated particle-to-
particle interaction does not make sense. Even if it were,
there would have to be a field (effect) to receive it. You
couldn't measure it, except in jolts (because it is so rare).
WS -- Now how about magnetism? I didn't ask You about
that yet.
HF -- That's another subject.



Return to front page

Would you like to send William Stoertz your comments ?