Epola Theory, QM and GTR

Moscow, Russia
April 4, 1997

Dear Glenn,

Thank you for responding in such fullness to my letter.
I am blessed indeed to have such a connection as you.
Science is important and Divine Principle can benefit
science, and vice versa.

I am answering you on-line because, although it is 
busy, it is suffienciently importnat.

My first impression about the Epola concept is that,
while I like it because it contains the concept of
something invisible, potentially "sung-sang", and
also it defines an absolute structure of space-time
underlying the material reality.

What I don't think is so great are two aspects 
which I perceive on a brief overview, just from
what you wrote (although I have heard vaguely of
this theory, I never read any presentation of the
concept before I saw yours):

(1) For a very important reason, Einstein denied
the "ether". However, Menahem affirms the "epola",
which seems very much like the "ether" concept, a
fixed or moving medium in which objects and waves
move. Only in this way could the universal constancy
of the speed of light be upheld. However, intuitively,
the absence of any ether is hard to imagine.

(2) I feel that this explanation has a danger of 
being still within the realm of a materialistic 
explanation or theory. (Note: I think that even
Unification Thought, as I have seen it presented
in general, has the danger of being understood in
a materialistic way, without any true reference to
the real "sung-sang" nor to spiritual world. That
we have to be careful of ourselves.") I think a
true understanding of the "sung-sang" or vertical,
internal, absolute dimension, is essential and
vital to understanding the foundation of reality
and science, and provides an absolute framework
as a context in which the Theory of Relativity can
be relativized by refering to an "absolute" axis,
sung-sang, which, I believe, can save the Throey
of Relativity in this time of ideological and
philosophical transition. I think the Theory
of Relativity is still universally true, within
time and space, but must be tied to the absolute
axis around which time and space themselves 
"rotate". This way, Unificationism can absorb
and raise up Einstein's theory of relativity, 
without contradicting it in any way. This is what
I have done with my "Unified Field Theory".

As you can see, Glenn, this is a very important
and historical discussion, which goes beyond you
and me, and will affect science and philosphy in
the future. So it is not just "mine", but a very
important framework upon which to adjust the
mathematical and physical theories which are
now in a process of development into the Completed
Testament Age.

I have a lot more to discuss, but I will have to
get back to it because we are very busy with the 
Blessing and National Messiah preparation, etc.

Your truly, ITPN
William Stoertz